|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The 2008 Indian embassy bombing in Kabul was a suicide bomb attack on the Indian embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan on July 7, 2008 at 8:30 AM local time.3 The suspected suicide car bombing took place near the gates of the embassy while the officials were trying to get inside.4 The bombing killed 58 people2 and wounded 141.5 The Indian embassy, which is in the center of Kabul, is located across the street from the office of the Interior Ministry of the Government of Afghanistan and is close to several other government buildings. The bombing occurred on a busy, tree-lined street where people usually line up at the embassy gates to apply for visas to India. 67 The toll makes the suicide bombing the deadliest attack in Kabul since the fall of the Taliban in 2001.8 The embassy reopened on July 14, 2008 after one week of closure.9 On August 1, 2008, The New York Times reported allegations by unnamed U.S. officials that claimed members of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency had aided the attack.10 A claim strongly denied by Pakistan.11 During the 15th SAARC summit summit in Colombo, Sri Lanka, Pakistan's Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani assured India that his government would carry out an independent investigation of the attack.1213
Background
During the United States-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, India offered intelligence and other forms of support to the coalition forces. After the overthrow of the Taliban, India established diplomatic relations with the newly-elected democratic government, provided aid and participated in Afghanistan's reconstruction efforts.14 Indo-Afghan relations strengthened in the wake of Afghanistan's persisting tensions and problems with Pakistan, which was suspected of sheltering and supporting the Taliban.1415 Both nations also developed strategic and military cooperation against the insurgency.15 India pursued a policy of close cooperation with Afghanistan in order to gain influence in Central Asia and also to keep a check on Kashmiri militants that it alleges are operating in Afghanistan.14 By 2007, India had pledged US$850 million to Afghan reconstruction efforts, the largest amount from any country without a military presence in Afghanistan.16 India also provides training to Afghan National Army officers and military personnels at its training institutions, including the National Defence Academy and the School of Artillery at Devlali.17 India has helped Afghanistan in "capacity-building" by training Afghan pilots and technicians in operating Russian-origin Mi-35 helicopter gunships. India is also a supplier of military parts for Afghan Soviet-era tanks and aircraft.17 About 3,000 Indians are estimated to be working on various reconstruction and developmental projects in Afghanistan, and they have often been subjected to attacks by Taliban insurgents.18 In November 2005, after an incident in which an Indian national was kidnapped and murdered, India deployed 200 soldiers of the elite Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) to provide security for Indian nationals and the projects supported by India.14 By 2008, ITBP's presence in Afghanistan was steadily increased to over 400 personnel.19 India is currently the largest regional donor of humanitarian aid and reconstruction efforts in post-Taliban Afghanistan.2021 India's growing influence in Afghanistan has upset pro-Taliban elements.22 The Times said in an editorial that with the United States and other NATO members unwilling to sustain long-term commitments to Afghanistan, the Taliban see India as the only regional enemy capable of resisting them.23 Prior attacksAccording to the New York Times, India's external ministry officials have been raising the issue of security of Indian personnel in Afghanistan for months.4 The Indian consulate in Jalalabad was attacked twice by hand grenades in 2007.24 One soldier of the ITBP was killed and four others injured in a terrorist attack by the Taliban on June 5, 2008.19 In the aftermath of the attack, India's Home Ministry issued a warning to the ITBP, asking them to take necessary precautionary measures and also to remain at guard against fidayeen (suicide bombers) attacks. It also noted that the security being provided by the Afghan Police was "not up to the mark". 19 The bombingThe car bomb detonated at approximately 8:30 a.m. local time on July 7, 2008. At the time of the explosion, people were lined up in front of the gates of the Indian embassy waiting to apply for visas. An explosive-packed Toyota Camry, driven by the suicide bomber, rammed into two Indian diplomatic vehicles entering the embassy and detonated.25 The gates to the embassy were blown off and the walls of some buildings in its compound were damaged.26 A plume of smoke and dust was seen rising from the center of Kabul city, and the explosion was heard several miles away.27 Several nearby shopkeepers also became immediate victims of the attack,28 and the nearby Indonesian embassy also suffered damage.3 Kabul Police immediately sealed off the area.27 A statement released by the Afghan interior ministry said, "The initial findings of the ministry show that the main target of this attack has not been security forces like in most attacks but has been particularly planned to target the Indian embassy".29 There was immediate confusion and panic in the Indian embassy after the bomb blasts. According to a CNN reporter, a man who answered the phone at the Indian embassy abruptly hung up, saying, "We are not fine. All communications have been cut off".6 The Ministry of External Affairs of Government of India was reported to be in touch with India's ambassador to Afghanistan, Jayant Prasad. The Indian ambassador and his deputy were inside the building complex at the time of the explosion but were not hurt.28 Indian External Affairs Minister, Pranab Mukherjee, called for an emergency meeting of officials in Delhi after the bomb attack to review security arrangements.28 An anonymous person reported that rumors said the Indian embassy had previously received bomb threats.3 CasualtiesMost of the 58 dead were locals and included two top Indian officials. Senior Indian Army officer Brigadier Ravi Datt Mehta was entering the embassy gates in a car along with V. Venkateswara Rao when the attack took place. Both were killed in the blast. Indian casualties
Casualties from other statesSix Afghan police constables were killed and five others sustained injuries.3 An Afghan Indian Embassy employee by the name of Niamutullah was also killed in the blast.31 The five Afghan guards outside the Indonesian Embassy were killed, and two Indonesian diplomats were injured in the attack.32 International reaction
On behalf of states around the world, their respective representatives commented on both the attack and the resulting casualties:
InvestigationsAfghanistan's intelligence agency Riyast-i-Amniyat-i-Milli, India's Research and Analysis Wing and the United States' CIA are reported to be scanning vast volumes of intercepted communications and questioning informants to find some clues.56 According to CNN-IBN, Indian and Afghan agencies believe that the Pakistani Army's 324 Military Intelligence Battalion based in Peshawar had planned the attack on the Indian embassy and executed it in collaboration with either the Taliban or al-Qaida.57 Afghanistan's Interior Minister has stated that the suicide bombers were trained in Pakistan.58 India's ambassador to Afghanistan, Jayant Prasad, stated that, after reviewing the scene, the main target of the attack was believed to be the Indian embassy building. He also added that, considering the huge amount of explosives used in the attack, it was clear that target was not top Indian diplomatic officials but the embassy itself. Bomb scene review further revealed that the embassy guard killed in the attack had his hand on the closed gates. The ambassador stated that it is likely that the guard did not open the gate because he saw a suspicious car driving behind an embassy vehicle. The suicide attacker then might have decided to explode his device near the gate rather than inside the embassy's compound. According to investigating officials, much of the impact was taken up by the sand filled blast barriers. These barriers, which were built across the embassy for added protection just one week before the blast, saved it from structural damage.59 According to TOI the identity of the attacker was "22-year-old Hamza Shakoor from Gujranwala district in Pakistan." They also claimed the "intelligence about the imminent attack was remarkably precise, giving an indication about the centres of planning and execution."60 American officials, meanwhile, believe that the attack was conducted by a network led by Maulavi Jalaluddin Haqqani.61 Allegations of Pakistani involvementDuring the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, which was backed by Pakistan, 62 India had supported the opposition Northern Alliance.63 After the fall of the Taliban in 2001, India opened four consulates in Herat, Mazari Sharif, Kandahar and Jalalabad and backed Hamid Karzai's government. India is Afghanistan's fifth-largest bilateral donor64 and its growing presence in post-war Afghanistan has caused much concern in Pakistan as it views Indian measures as a threat to its influence in the region.656667 The President of Pakistan, Pervez Musharraf, accused Afghan President Hamid Karzai of favoring India.68 Islamabad has also reportedly accused Indian consulates in Kandahar and Jalalabad of providing arms and money to insurgents in Pakistan's troubled Balochistan region,69 a claim repeated by Urdu newspapers in Pakistan. Some analysts thus claim that Pakistan had a strong motive to target Indian nationals and their economic projects in Afghanistan.70 The statement by Afghan President Hamid Karzai noted that "enemies of Afghan-India ties were behind attack" without clearly specifying which enemies.71 On July 7, 2008, Afghanistan's Interior Ministry claimed that the attack was carried in collaboration with a "a regional intelligence service"72 and added that the bombers received training in Pakistan.73 Afghanistan has in the past blamed Pakistan for various terror incidents on its soil74 and there have been reports of Afghan officials blaming Pakistan for the attack on the Indian embassy.7576 According to the Times of India, Indian intelligence officials suspect that Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) had a role to play in this attack.77 Indian security analyst Ajai Sahni of the Institute of Conflict Management alleged that, "the ISI-backed Taliban will not allow any Indian consolidation in Afghanistan, nor will they allow any stability in Kabul."78 Denying its involvement in the attacks, a Taliban spokesman said in a statement, "they (India) send secret military experts to Afghanistan and they train [the] Afghan army. Had we carried out the attack, we would have claimed responsibility for it with pride since we have good reasons for it." The Taliban further stated that the attack had its roots in the regional Indo-Pakistan rivalry.79 On July 8, Afghanistan stated that it had no doubts that the attack was carried out in collaboration with "foreign intelligence agencies", an implicit reference to Pakistan's ISI.80 However, Prime minister of Pakistan Yousaf Raza Gillani denied any involvement of ISI in the attack and also remarked that his country had no interest in destabilizing Afghanistan.81 US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated, "I haven't seen any evidence or proof that foreign agents were involved" and added that the United States was offering help to Afghan and Indian governments to investigate further.82 On July 13 India stated their suspicions about the ISI's involvement in the attack. India’s national security advisor M.K. Narayanan said, "We have no doubt that the ISI is behind this." 83 On August 1, 2008, The New York Times reported that unnamed officials in the United States had confirmed Pakistani involvement in the anti-Indian attack.84 The newspaper reported allegations that the involvement was based on intercepted communications between Pakistani intelligence officers and the perpetrators before the attack, which, however, were not detailed enough to warn of any specific attack. They want to say that the deputy director of the C.I.A., Stephen R. Kappes, had been ordered to Islamabad before the attack took place. US officials noted that Pakistani involvement in the attack calls into question the reliability of Pakistan as an ally in the American war on terror.84. Pakistani foreign ministry spokesman, Mohammed Sadiq, described the report as "total rubbish" and said there was no evidence of ISI involvement. "The foreign newspapers keep writing such things against ISI, and we reject these allegations."11 An alleged intercepted telephone conversation apparently revealed that ISI agents masterminded the operation. The United States also claimed to have arrested an ISI officer inside Afghanistan. United States President George W. Bush confronted Pakistani prime minister Yusuf Raza Gillani in Washington D.C. with evidence of ISI's involvement in the Kabul attack and warned that in the case of another attack he would have to take "serious action".85 On October 15, both India and Pakistan agreed to continue their dialogue to address all bilateral issues, including cross-border terrorism and ceasefire violations. At the meeting, however, Islamabad denied any role of the ISI in the July 7 bombings of the Indian embassy in Kabul. Pakistan's National Security Advisor Mahmud Ali Durrani said "No No No Incorrect" when asked to comment on reports alleging that ISI masterminded the Kabul blasts. It was also clarified that the Kabul bombings will be discussed in detail at the meeting of the joint anti-terror mechanism later the same month.86 On October 23, it was reported that India had shared sensitive information with Pakistan that pointed towards the ISI's alleged complicity in the embassy bombing as both countries ended a special meeting of their joint-terror mechanism on a "positive" note.87 Further threats to Indian nationalsA bomb was found on a bus transporting 12 Indian road construction workers of Border Roads Organization to Afghanistan on 8 July 2008 in Zaranj, Nimruz, a day after the attack on Indian embassy in Kabul.88 The engineers and workers on board reported having noticed a "suspicious package" after boarding the bus on the day, but it was only after further investigation that it was revealed that a remote-operated bomb had been placed on board. Provincial governor Ghulam Dastgir Azad placed the blame for the attempted bombing of the workers on Taliban militants, who have been responsible for more than a dozen worker deaths in the area over the last few years.89 Calls for Indian military interventionAccording to some defense analysts, India should increase its military presence in Afghanistan not only to protect Indian projects and nationals there, but also to aid the coalition forces to improve the overall security situation in the war-torn country. Gurmeet Kanwal, head of the Center for Land Warfare Studies, said, "I would say the time has come to live up to our responsibility. If it involves military intervention, so be it."90 C. Raja Mohan, an Indian foreign policy analyst, urged India's government to increase military presence in Afghanistan and also added "Afghanistan needs to be stabilized. Pakistan needs to be stabilized. This requires more drastic remedies."90 In April 2008 Afghanistan's Defense Minister formally requested India's help in counter-insurgency operations during his visit to New Delhi. 91 India has already provided large-scale military equipment to the Afghan National Army92 and has also given crucial intelligence inputs to the United States-led coalition forces.93 Several members of the Afghan army have undergone anti-terrorist training in India94 and in April 2007, the Indian Army also sent a delegation to set up an army training school in Afghanistan and Uzbekistan.95 In September 2007, India held a joint military exercise with the United Kingdom to train British forces in counter-insurgency operations, particularly those in Afghanistan.96 India also has an operational air force command at the Farkhor Air Base in neighboring Tajikistan.97 Indian Express said in an editorial, "after the Kabul bombing, India must come to terms with an important question that it has avoided debating so far. New Delhi cannot continue to expand its economic and diplomatic activity in Afghanistan, while avoiding a commensurate increase in its military presence there. For too long, New Delhi has deferred to Pakistani and American sensitivities about raising India's strategic profile in Afghanistan."98 However, some analysts have feared that if India joins the United States-led coalition forces in Afghanistan, it would harm the soft power it has gradually built in the region as a result of the widespread popularity of Bollywood films and Indian television soaps among Afghans.24 See alsoReferences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||